<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How we&#8217;ll lay out websites in 2016</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/</link>
	<description>All you ever needed to know about CSS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Escort Agency Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-262364</link>
		<dc:creator>Escort Agency Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-262364</guid>
		<description> Very interesting insights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Very interesting insights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gucci discount</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-262259</link>
		<dc:creator>Gucci discount</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 08:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-262259</guid>
		<description> good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWL-Projekt &#187; That was the London Web Standards “Pick’n&#8217;Mix” meetup</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-260802</link>
		<dc:creator>SWL-Projekt &#187; That was the London Web Standards “Pick’n&#8217;Mix” meetup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-260802</guid>
		<description>[...] first to take the stage with a 5 minute lighting talk about CSS layout models. He had written an article with the same title on CSS3.info in 2006 and covered what had improved since then (not much, really). His slides are available on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first to take the stage with a 5 minute lighting talk about CSS layout models. He had written an article with the same title on CSS3.info in 2006 and covered what had improved since then (not much, really). His slides are available on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That was the London Web Standards &#8220;Pick&#8217;n&#8217;Mix&#8221; meetup &#124; Christian Heilmann&#039;s blog &#8211; Wait till I come!</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-260762</link>
		<dc:creator>That was the London Web Standards &#8220;Pick&#8217;n&#8217;Mix&#8221; meetup &#124; Christian Heilmann&#039;s blog &#8211; Wait till I come!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-260762</guid>
		<description>[...] first to take the stage with a 5 minute lighting talk about CSS layout models. He had written an article with the same title on CSS3.info in 2006 and covered what had improved since then (not much, really). His slides are available on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first to take the stage with a 5 minute lighting talk about CSS layout models. He had written an article with the same title on CSS3.info in 2006 and covered what had improved since then (not much, really). His slides are available on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSS3 Flexible Box Module &#124; Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-260240</link>
		<dc:creator>CSS3 Flexible Box Module &#124; Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-260240</guid>
		<description>[...] to figure out, however, is if the Flexible Box Module is a complement to or replacement for the Advanced Layout Module. Browser support for the latter seems to have stagnated, so I’m guessing the Flexible Module is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to figure out, however, is if the Flexible Box Module is a complement to or replacement for the Advanced Layout Module. Browser support for the latter seems to have stagnated, so I’m guessing the Flexible Module is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How we’ll lay out websites in 2016 &#124; Beastx&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-257879</link>
		<dc:creator>How we’ll lay out websites in 2016 &#124; Beastx&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-257879</guid>
		<description>[...] from: http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/    Posted in Firefox, Html Css, Internet Explorer, News, Opera, Others, Safari   Subscribe to  RSS  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from: <a href="http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/" rel="nofollow">http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/</a>    Posted in Firefox, Html Css, Internet Explorer, News, Opera, Others, Safari   Subscribe to  RSS  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonny</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-238292</link>
		<dc:creator>jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-238292</guid>
		<description>What about Flexible Box Layout? It seems nice.

http://damowmow.com/temp/csswg/flexbox.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Flexible Box Layout? It seems nice.</p>
<p><a href="http://damowmow.com/temp/csswg/flexbox.html" rel="nofollow">http://damowmow.com/temp/csswg/flexbox.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chovy</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-237528</link>
		<dc:creator>chovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-237528</guid>
		<description>My post didn&#039;t take the tags in my example...

ie: &lt;nav&gt;&lt;item&gt;Contact&lt;/item&gt;&lt;item&gt;Jobs&lt;/item&gt;&lt;/nav&gt;

transformed to: &lt;xhtml&#124;pdf&#124;wml&#124;email&#124;wap&#124;sms&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My post didn&#8217;t take the tags in my example&#8230;</p>
<p>ie: &lt;nav&gt;&lt;item&gt;Contact&lt;/item&gt;&lt;item&gt;Jobs&lt;/item&gt;&lt;/nav&gt;</p>
<p>transformed to: &lt;xhtml|pdf|wml|email|wap|sms&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chovy</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-237527</link>
		<dc:creator>chovy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-237527</guid>
		<description>By 2016, we&#039;ll be able to use rule:

   @embed_browser(&#039;safari, firefox&#039;);

...in our CSS file :)

It does seem rather overkill, and perhaps not all that useful.
I prefer to code markup in xml, and transform it to something useful:

ie: ContactJobs

transformed to: </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By 2016, we&#8217;ll be able to use rule:</p>
<p>   @embed_browser(&#8216;safari, firefox&#8217;);</p>
<p>&#8230;in our CSS file :)</p>
<p>It does seem rather overkill, and perhaps not all that useful.<br />
I prefer to code markup in xml, and transform it to something useful:</p>
<p>ie: ContactJobs</p>
<p>transformed to:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Further progression in layout modules - CSS3 . Info</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-237525</link>
		<dc:creator>Further progression in layout modules - CSS3 . Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/how-well-layout-websites-in-2016/#comment-237525</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week saw another layout proposal, the template layout module, reissued as an updated working draft. Previously known as the advanced layout module (and featured in our article How We&#8217;ll Lay Out Websites in 2016). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week saw another layout proposal, the template layout module, reissued as an updated working draft. Previously known as the advanced layout module (and featured in our article How We&#8217;ll Lay Out Websites in 2016). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: css3.info @ 2012-02-08 09:45:17 -->
