<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IE9 to include alternative &#8216;CSS.2012&#8242; standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/</link>
	<description>All you ever needed to know about CSS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-259723</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-259723</guid>
		<description>Wow, 2 years on and this is the second page in Google for IE9, gave me a scare for a second... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, 2 years on and this is the second page in Google for IE9, gave me a scare for a second&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sushil</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-259107</link>
		<dc:creator>sushil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 16:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-259107</guid>
		<description> inernate explorare 9 very good . he help fast downlanding</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> inernate explorare 9 very good . he help fast downlanding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MiD-AwE</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-258836</link>
		<dc:creator>MiD-AwE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-258836</guid>
		<description> Ha, ha, you might have gotten me with this ( I was thinking this must be an old post - before macroslop repented ) but I have just been testing IE9 CSS3 HTML5 http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/ 

Nice try though. Good one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ha, ha, you might have gotten me with this ( I was thinking this must be an old post &#8211; before macroslop repented ) but I have just been testing IE9 CSS3 HTML5 <a href="http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/" rel="nofollow">http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/</a> </p>
<p>Nice try though. Good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Magarshak</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-258746</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Magarshak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-258746</guid>
		<description> Ah, April fools joke. NICE :) Still up there though. I&#039;m only on alert on April 1st.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ah, April fools joke. NICE :) Still up there though. I&#8217;m only on alert on April 1st.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Magarshak</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-258745</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Magarshak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-258745</guid>
		<description> That is HILARIOUS.

You know what &quot;breaks&quot; the web? Microsoft&#039;s non-standards-compliant browsers. The infamous IE6 is the best example that all web developers love to bash, and then IE7 -- while better -- still caused lots of problems. IE8 has caught up.

And here&#039;s a Microsoft IE guy saying that &quot;other&quot; browsers (which were and ARE more standards-compliant) are breaking the web. What gall.

But wait there&#039;s more. Not only that, but &quot;they&quot; will &quot;fix&quot; the web by introducing ANOTHER proprietary standard, and one that other browsers can&#039;t even license for several YEARS until microsoft feels it&#039;s &quot;stable enough&quot; and &quot;ready&quot;. Not only that but they will once again use their market share to create this proprietary situation.

Well, at least it&#039;s not all bad. After all, Web Developers can choose to code this specifically for IE9, or ignore it. That&#039;s great. Back in the day, IE didn&#039;t even SUPPORT the standards. So I guess it&#039;s fine after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That is HILARIOUS.</p>
<p>You know what &#8220;breaks&#8221; the web? Microsoft&#8217;s non-standards-compliant browsers. The infamous IE6 is the best example that all web developers love to bash, and then IE7 &#8212; while better &#8212; still caused lots of problems. IE8 has caught up.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s a Microsoft IE guy saying that &#8220;other&#8221; browsers (which were and ARE more standards-compliant) are breaking the web. What gall.</p>
<p>But wait there&#8217;s more. Not only that, but &#8220;they&#8221; will &#8220;fix&#8221; the web by introducing ANOTHER proprietary standard, and one that other browsers can&#8217;t even license for several YEARS until microsoft feels it&#8217;s &#8220;stable enough&#8221; and &#8220;ready&#8221;. Not only that but they will once again use their market share to create this proprietary situation.</p>
<p>Well, at least it&#8217;s not all bad. After all, Web Developers can choose to code this specifically for IE9, or ignore it. That&#8217;s great. Back in the day, IE didn&#8217;t even SUPPORT the standards. So I guess it&#8217;s fine after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby Worth</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-257953</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Worth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-257953</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a Grade-A, chemically-pure cock-monkey. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a Grade-A, chemically-pure cock-monkey. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-257944</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-257944</guid>
		<description>Internet Explorer has never been a good browser, and now 
when we have Firefox (ok and others - Chrome, Safari and so on...), I don&#039;t think they can win the poor web developers trust EVER AGAIN. To much pain and suffering around IE6 which is still alive, hopefully not for long..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Explorer has never been a good browser, and now<br />
when we have Firefox (ok and others &#8211; Chrome, Safari and so on&#8230;), I don&#8217;t think they can win the poor web developers trust EVER AGAIN. To much pain and suffering around IE6 which is still alive, hopefully not for long..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-257812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-257812</guid>
		<description>This joke almost caused me a heart attack (Phew)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This joke almost caused me a heart attack (Phew)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artazor</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-257713</link>
		<dc:creator>Artazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-257713</guid>
		<description> Yes, It was really scarry!!! Seeking for IE9 and found such a $#@$#@% !!! (sorry) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yes, It was really scarry!!! Seeking for IE9 and found such a $#@$#@% !!! (sorry) :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gummisig</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/ie9-to-include-alternative-css2012-standard/comment-page-2/#comment-257662</link>
		<dc:creator>gummisig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/?p=275#comment-257662</guid>
		<description> shit man, even if this is an old post this is so not funny ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> shit man, even if this is an old post this is so not funny ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: css3.info @ 2012-02-08 22:34:24 -->
