<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KHTML 3.5.6 is the most CSS3-compliant of all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/</link>
	<description>All you ever needed to know about CSS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:52:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The unforking of KDE&#8217;s KHTML and Webkit &#124; Ars Technica</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-262845</link>
		<dc:creator>The unforking of KDE&#8217;s KHTML and Webkit &#124; Ars Technica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-262845</guid>
		<description>[...] since there are features in it that need to be ported into Webkit. For example, KHTML (in KDE 4) implements portions of the definition of the CSS3 standard, which will need to be adopted into Webkit and so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since there are features in it that need to be ported into Webkit. For example, KHTML (in KDE 4) implements portions of the definition of the CSS3 standard, which will need to be adopted into Webkit and so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silviu</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-259990</link>
		<dc:creator>Silviu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-259990</guid>
		<description> Using khtml will affect the CSS appearance in Internet Explorer? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Using khtml will affect the CSS appearance in Internet Explorer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 通向 KDE 4 之路（九）：Dolphin 与 Konqueror &#124; LinuxDig</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-148577</link>
		<dc:creator>通向 KDE 4 之路（九）：Dolphin 与 Konqueror &#124; LinuxDig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-148577</guid>
		<description>[...] 您可以将 Konqueror 设置为默认使用标签浏览，也可以定制其它相关界面。它目前常作为一个网络浏览器来使用，只是偶尔被用于作文件管理。 Konqueror 最初就是由文件管理器衍生而来，现在它却越来越多地被 KDE 用户们用作网络浏览器。作为一个网络浏览器，Konqueror 工作的很好，它对 CSS 3 的兼容性非常出色，包括对高度期望的“不透明标签”的支持也很好。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 您可以将 Konqueror 设置为默认使用标签浏览，也可以定制其它相关界面。它目前常作为一个网络浏览器来使用，只是偶尔被用于作文件管理。 Konqueror 最初就是由文件管理器衍生而来，现在它却越来越多地被 KDE 用户们用作网络浏览器。作为一个网络浏览器，Konqueror 工作的很好，它对 CSS 3 的兼容性非常出色，包括对高度期望的“不透明标签”的支持也很好。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oil paintings</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-141600</link>
		<dc:creator>Oil paintings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-141600</guid>
		<description>Your link to text overflow: ellipsis seems broken.  Hopefully you can fix it ASAP as I am really interested with the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your link to text overflow: ellipsis seems broken.  Hopefully you can fix it ASAP as I am really interested with the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SneakyWho_am_i</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-114012</link>
		<dc:creator>SneakyWho_am_i</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-114012</guid>
		<description>@music: I concur, it benefits everybody in the short term when someone switches from Internet Explorer (notice, I don&#039;t mention which browser they switch _to_, that&#039;s not really important)

I think the main reason anybody doesn&#039;t switch is because they don&#039;t understand the benefits. An easy 99.9% of users who leave the big blue e don&#039;t look back. The trouble with education is finding people with a long enough attention span to be educated.

When the users use a proper browser:
- design is quicker and easier (and cheaper) ... Consequently the end result is a much higher quality product
- less errors, less crashes
- better privacy, security and speed
- better content control (you only look at pron when you WANT to... your KIDS only look at pron when they want to)

I blame the &quot;If it aint broke, don&#039;t fix it&quot; mentality.

I will concur with the article itself here also - no engine has better css3 support than khtml, with its support for &quot;not&quot; and suchlike already :)

I&#039;m a firefox user though, also very at home in opera. konqueror still has problems under the surface, largely with mime types, DTDs, javascript and the &quot;cascading&quot; in cascading stylesheets.
Example of cascading problem in konqueror:
make two stylesheets. one regular and one special on which says only
* { font-size:60%; }
you&#039;ll get a different result in konqueror by rearranging the order tof the link elements on the page... most surprising. no other browser does this, and it&#039;s not appropriate...

Hopefully I&#039;m just crazy and nobody else can replicate that, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@music: I concur, it benefits everybody in the short term when someone switches from Internet Explorer (notice, I don&#8217;t mention which browser they switch _to_, that&#8217;s not really important)</p>
<p>I think the main reason anybody doesn&#8217;t switch is because they don&#8217;t understand the benefits. An easy 99.9% of users who leave the big blue e don&#8217;t look back. The trouble with education is finding people with a long enough attention span to be educated.</p>
<p>When the users use a proper browser:<br />
- design is quicker and easier (and cheaper) &#8230; Consequently the end result is a much higher quality product<br />
- less errors, less crashes<br />
- better privacy, security and speed<br />
- better content control (you only look at pron when you WANT to&#8230; your KIDS only look at pron when they want to)</p>
<p>I blame the &#8220;If it aint broke, don&#8217;t fix it&#8221; mentality.</p>
<p>I will concur with the article itself here also &#8211; no engine has better css3 support than khtml, with its support for &#8220;not&#8221; and suchlike already :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a firefox user though, also very at home in opera. konqueror still has problems under the surface, largely with mime types, DTDs, javascript and the &#8220;cascading&#8221; in cascading stylesheets.<br />
Example of cascading problem in konqueror:<br />
make two stylesheets. one regular and one special on which says only<br />
* { font-size:60%; }<br />
you&#8217;ll get a different result in konqueror by rearranging the order tof the link elements on the page&#8230; most surprising. no other browser does this, and it&#8217;s not appropriate&#8230;</p>
<p>Hopefully I&#8217;m just crazy and nobody else can replicate that, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebKit set to strengthen - CSS3 . Info</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-32246</link>
		<dc:creator>WebKit set to strengthen - CSS3 . Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-32246</guid>
		<description>[...] an interesting history of the two engines - there is a bit of work to be done, such as importing KHTMLs advanced CSS 3 features, before the unforking happens, but it should mean that WebKit gains a lot more active developers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an interesting history of the two engines &#8211; there is a bit of work to be done, such as importing KHTMLs advanced CSS 3 features, before the unforking happens, but it should mean that WebKit gains a lot more active developers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: music</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-32197</link>
		<dc:creator>music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-32197</guid>
		<description>A great success on the CSS3 front, and the addition of ellipsis won’t hurt either.  I’m not sure why more people haven’t caught on to free solutions.  By all rights, this should be a race between Konquorer and Mozilla.  In the first place, why would anyone pay for something they can get for free?  In the second, the very fact that this is open source means it is a better product.  I recognize that Microsoft has a bit of a stranglehold on the market, but I don’t think it has to be that way.  Speaking personally, the reason it took me so long to switch as because I didn’t completely understand the advantages, and wasn’t sure I’d be able to access the same sites I always had.  I think that in order for these kinds of open source programs to really take off, it may take a campaign of education.  Obviously such a campaign is difficult in the face of MS’s superior advertising budget, but that’s assuming the campaign take place through traditional channels.  We are a collection of web-savvy programmers -- isn’t there some way to tackle this problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great success on the CSS3 front, and the addition of ellipsis won’t hurt either.  I’m not sure why more people haven’t caught on to free solutions.  By all rights, this should be a race between Konquorer and Mozilla.  In the first place, why would anyone pay for something they can get for free?  In the second, the very fact that this is open source means it is a better product.  I recognize that Microsoft has a bit of a stranglehold on the market, but I don’t think it has to be that way.  Speaking personally, the reason it took me so long to switch as because I didn’t completely understand the advantages, and wasn’t sure I’d be able to access the same sites I always had.  I think that in order for these kinds of open source programs to really take off, it may take a campaign of education.  Obviously such a campaign is difficult in the face of MS’s superior advertising budget, but that’s assuming the campaign take place through traditional channels.  We are a collection of web-savvy programmers &#8212; isn’t there some way to tackle this problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bragging rights to the proper browser - CSS3 . Info</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-28340</link>
		<dc:creator>Bragging rights to the proper browser - CSS3 . Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-28340</guid>
		<description>[...] all the tests in our CSS Selectors test. Those bragging rights go to Konqueror, as we pointed out in January already. Release 3.5.6 of KHTML was the first to support all the tests, not any other browser, sorry David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all the tests in our CSS Selectors test. Those bragging rights go to Konqueror, as we pointed out in January already. Release 3.5.6 of KHTML was the first to support all the tests, not any other browser, sorry David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pardus 2007.1 yansılarda</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-9256</link>
		<dc:creator>Pardus 2007.1 yansılarda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-9256</guid>
		<description>[...] KDE 3.5.6 gelmiş. Bu sürümdeki KHTML-3.5.6, CSS3 uyumlu sayfa gösterim motoru ünvanını almıştı. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] KDE 3.5.6 gelmiş. Bu sürümdeki KHTML-3.5.6, CSS3 uyumlu sayfa gösterim motoru ünvanını almıştı. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trejkaz</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/comment-page-1/#comment-7662</link>
		<dc:creator>Trejkaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/blog/khtml-356-is-the-most-css3-compliant-of-all/#comment-7662</guid>
		<description>The browser Konqueror does not work with some websites. This has to be addressed... by the buggy websites. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The browser Konqueror does not work with some websites. This has to be addressed&#8230; by the buggy websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: css3.info @ 2012-02-08 22:36:21 -->
