Comments on: Lists to get more decorative http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/ All you ever needed to know about CSS3 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:52:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: cwebba1 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-262310 cwebba1 Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:27:54 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-262310  I continue to struggle with lists – often going over the same territory. If ever there was a part of HTML that needs a total make-over, it is lists. A) That damned bullet. should be added where wanted, not eliminated where not. B) That damned bullet should be whatever glyph we want, not just a choice of four meaningless styles (square,disc or circle, it's still semantically null). C) Lining up the damned bullet – always a pain D) controlling the indent of that damned bullet - ouch! And then the are horizontal menus: IMHO a menu is not a list. Give horizontal menus their own semantic element in the DOM. #JustSaying - @cwebba1  I continue to struggle with lists – often going over the same territory. If ever there was a part of HTML that needs a total make-over, it is lists.
A) That damned bullet. should be added where wanted, not eliminated where not.
B) That damned bullet should be whatever glyph we want, not just a choice of four meaningless styles (square,disc or circle, it’s still semantically null).
C) Lining up the damned bullet – always a pain
D) controlling the indent of that damned bullet – ouch!

And then the are horizontal menus: IMHO a menu is not a list. Give horizontal menus their own semantic element in the DOM.
#JustSaying – @cwebba1

]]> By: KodRella.com Web geliştirme, Tasarım, Programlama üzerine sade bir blog. » Web Geliştirme – CSS3 İle gelen özellikler http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-257924 KodRella.com Web geliştirme, Tasarım, Programlama üzerine sade bir blog. » Web Geliştirme – CSS3 İle gelen özellikler Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:02:40 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-257924 [...] http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/ [...] [...] http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/ [...]

]]> By: Sam Hickson | Hatch Media http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-136110 Sam Hickson | Hatch Media Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:09:25 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-136110 I tend to use the li styling very often in my menus and they prove very successful and i feel they are flexible in many ways... I tend to use the li styling very often in my menus and they prove very successful and i feel they are flexible in many ways…

]]> By: Lists to get more decorative « CSS HELP http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-40639 Lists to get more decorative « CSS HELP Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:34:56 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-40639 [...] Lists to get more decorative [...] [...] Lists to get more decorative [...]

]]> By: Dave Woods - HTML, CSS, Web Design » Are we getting carried away with CSS3? http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-39473 Dave Woods - HTML, CSS, Web Design » Are we getting carried away with CSS3? Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:27:59 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-39473 [...] resource for this kind of information and a lot of the content is useful, but the recent post on Lists to get more decorative which contains information on the new lists module got me thinking that some of the modules being [...] [...] resource for this kind of information and a lot of the content is useful, but the recent post on Lists to get more decorative which contains information on the new lists module got me thinking that some of the modules being [...]

]]> By: Peter Gasston http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-39463 Peter Gasston Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:32:10 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-39463 @ Natalie: If only it were that easy! @ Natalie: If only it were that easy!

]]> By: Fatih Hayrioğlu’nun not defteri » 03 Eylül 2007 Web’den Seçme Haberler http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-39414 Fatih Hayrioğlu’nun not defteri » 03 Eylül 2007 Web’den Seçme Haberler Mon, 03 Sep 2007 07:25:13 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-39414 [...] CSS3′deki listeler daha süslü olacakmış. Link [...] [...] CSS3′deki listeler daha süslü olacakmış. Link [...]

]]> By: Natalie Jost http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-39163 Natalie Jost Sun, 02 Sep 2007 02:17:44 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-39163 "Perhaps most annoying of all, you can’t have the glyph be a different colour from the content without extra markup" I've found that styling the UL or OL one way and the li another works well (eg. ol font size 20px, li font size 12px - for larger numbers). I imagine you could do the same with colors, or not? “Perhaps most annoying of all, you can’t have the glyph be a different colour from the content without extra markup”

I’ve found that styling the UL or OL one way and the li another works well (eg. ol font size 20px, li font size 12px – for larger numbers). I imagine you could do the same with colors, or not?

]]> By: Haruka aka Seremel http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-39006 Haruka aka Seremel Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:30:15 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-39006 I mean "instead of using the other" in the comment above ^^' I mean “instead of using the other” in the comment above ^^’

]]> By: Haruka aka Seremel http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/comment-page-1/#comment-39005 Haruka aka Seremel Sat, 01 Sep 2007 06:28:34 +0000 http://www.css3.info/lists-to-get-more-decorative/#comment-39005 Dave Woods: when you simulate one (possibly incorrectly implemented) feature instead of the other that is specifically exist for some purpose that's basically a hack. Dave Woods: when you simulate one (possibly incorrectly implemented) feature instead of the other that is specifically exist for some purpose that’s basically a hack.

]]>