<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updates to css3.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/</link>
	<description>All you ever needed to know about CSS3</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: fhdfhd</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-42272</link>
		<dc:creator>fhdfhd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-42272</guid>
		<description>To me, it looks like browser devs have been experimenting with new ways of rendering text without knowing what they where doing.

Because i think IE7 and Safari&#039;s ways of rendering text is ugly, and i dont think the devs knew what they where doing when using it in official releases.

But perhaps its still unofficially in the &quot;beta stage&quot;, for some reason devs have a hard time admitting when somthing they made sucks.

Let alone the way some browsers render text-shadow, witch usually just makes the text harder to read.. /sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, it looks like browser devs have been experimenting with new ways of rendering text without knowing what they where doing.</p>
<p>Because i think IE7 and Safari&#8217;s ways of rendering text is ugly, and i dont think the devs knew what they where doing when using it in official releases.</p>
<p>But perhaps its still unofficially in the &#8220;beta stage&#8221;, for some reason devs have a hard time admitting when somthing they made sucks.</p>
<p>Let alone the way some browsers render text-shadow, witch usually just makes the text harder to read.. /sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opera 9.5 Alpha Feedback</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40644</link>
		<dc:creator>Opera 9.5 Alpha Feedback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40644</guid>
		<description>[...] new features to the test, you can either head on over to David Storey&#8217;s list of demos or to CSS3 . Info, which has a section dedicated to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new features to the test, you can either head on over to David Storey&#8217;s list of demos or to CSS3 . Info, which has a section dedicated to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC John SESE Cuneta</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40587</link>
		<dc:creator>JC John SESE Cuneta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40587</guid>
		<description>Text-shadow works great under Safari 3, but in Opera 9.5a1 it doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Text-shadow works great under Safari 3, but in Opera 9.5a1 it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40371</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40371</guid>
		<description>Thx! fixed that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx! fixed that :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albin</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40370</link>
		<dc:creator>Albin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40370</guid>
		<description>A link is displayed as html on this page:
http://www.css3.info/preview/border-image/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A link is displayed as html on this page:<br />
<a href="http://www.css3.info/preview/border-image/" rel="nofollow">http://www.css3.info/preview/border-image/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40366</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40366</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll have a look at all of it tonight :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll have a look at all of it tonight :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Perduel</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40363</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Perduel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40363</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I have to agree. Text-shadow was ok in navigation menu. What bugs me is those green headings with grey shadow. At least on my (old) monitor they are pretty hard to read.

And Opera 9.5 is incredibly fast and most importantly it is stable. Few bugs here and there. Nice job Opera!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have to agree. Text-shadow was ok in navigation menu. What bugs me is those green headings with grey shadow. At least on my (old) monitor they are pretty hard to read.</p>
<p>And Opera 9.5 is incredibly fast and most importantly it is stable. Few bugs here and there. Nice job Opera!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriel Kloppenburg</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40303</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriel Kloppenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40303</guid>
		<description>Yes I agree with Lars, you should bring back the text-shadow!
And I do the same when I&#039;m on a windows computer, the first thing i do is ether change there resolution to it&#039;s native res (on LCD&#039;s) and put clear type on. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree with Lars, you should bring back the text-shadow!<br />
And I do the same when I&#8217;m on a windows computer, the first thing i do is ether change there resolution to it&#8217;s native res (on LCD&#8217;s) and put clear type on. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40089</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40089</guid>
		<description>I really liked the text-shadow in the menu, now it&#039;s back to being flat.

It only looked a bit bad if you didn&#039;t have font smoothing enabled, but all text looks like crap without font smoothing so I don&#039;t see what the big deal is. I really can&#039;t stand using Windows without Cleartype these days.

The shadowed menus look great when you have font smoothing on.

Oh well, guess I&#039;ll have to make a user stylesheet to return the nice stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked the text-shadow in the menu, now it&#8217;s back to being flat.</p>
<p>It only looked a bit bad if you didn&#8217;t have font smoothing enabled, but all text looks like crap without font smoothing so I don&#8217;t see what the big deal is. I really can&#8217;t stand using Windows without Cleartype these days.</p>
<p>The shadowed menus look great when you have font smoothing on.</p>
<p>Oh well, guess I&#8217;ll have to make a user stylesheet to return the nice stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost de Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/comment-page-1/#comment-40085</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost de Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.css3.info/updates-to-css3info/#comment-40085</guid>
		<description>You are, of course, right, however, css3 is not &quot;official&quot; yet either so who cares? :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are, of course, right, however, css3 is not &#8220;official&#8221; yet either so who cares? :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: css3.info @ 2010-07-30 19:09:22 -->