• 200630 Nov

    The difficulty many developers face when they start moving to table-less sites is getting the layout to work. Floats and positioning are easy enough for basic layouts, but start to become incredibly complex when moving to a more advanced level. When the push to move to pure CSS layouts became intense, the problem was – and is – that tables are still a lot more convenient in many cases, and there is sometimes no decent alternative without contorting yourself; you can’t even use the display: table family, as there’s no support in IE.

    An interesting potential solution is in the CSS3 Advanced Layout module.

  • 200610 Nov

    It’s all gone a bit quiet round here… sorry about that, but there’s not a lot of movement on CSS3, and I know the authors here are quite busy personally.

    Anyway, potentially big news is that the WHATWG are asking for developer feedback on HTML5.

    I’m still wading through the document, but of what I’ve read so far, of most interest to CSS fanatics will be a group of new, semantic tags; for example

    ,

    Of course these aren’t directly related to CSS3, but it should help save a lot of classes, ids and tag soup if implemented – and that’s the key. Even if it turns into a recommendation, how long until HTML5 is supported in IE – if at all. Many questions, many variables; but stay positive, and give your opinion.

  • 200616 Oct

    Last week we unveiled the CSS selector test over at css3.info. The test consists of over several hundred separate test cases, each designed to test a certain aspect of the compatibility of your browser with the CSS selector standards. Today we are going to expand the number of test cases to 578.

    The new tests have a large impact of the results. There are quite a few browsers that used to pass with the old test cases, but fail with the new test cases. Generally we added test cases for the following situations:

    • Dynamic updates: If you update the DOM using Javascript this should also affect the CSS selectors. Take for example the :empty selector. It only matches elements without any children. If you dynamically add a new child it should not longer match that particular element.
    • White space in attribute selectors: There are four different ways an attribute selector could be written: [attribute=value], [attribute =value], [attribute= value] and [attribute = value]. We now test if your browser supports all of these variants.
    • Case sensitivity of the value in attribute selectors: The previous version of the test contained a test case for determining if the value of an attribute selector was compared in a case-insensitive way. However this was not complete. We only tested the align attribute – which should be treated in a case-insensitive way. Only Konqueror failed this test. But there are also a lot of other attributes which should be tested in a case-sensitive way. Now almost every browser fails this test. More information about this case-sensitivity can be found on rakaz.nl: CSS selector bugs: Case sensitivity

    We also changed the way results are reported. Instead of just showing whether a selector failed or passed, we now detect if the selector is fully supported, buggy, or not supported at all. This should give all of us a better idea about the state of the compatibility of each browser.

    Browser Version Supported Buggy Unsupported No. tests passed
    Internet Explorer 6 10 1 32 276
    Internet Explorer 7 RC 1 13 4 26 330
    Opera 8.5.4 18 3 22 317
    Safari 2.0.4 21 7 15 336
    Firefox 1.0.8 24 9 10 352
    Opera 9.0.2 25 3 15 346
    Safari r16925 25 9 9 355
    Firefox 1.5.0.7 26 10 7 357
    Konqueror 3.5.4 37 6 0 570

Hosting by: